Let’s value our differences – and still work together

I have received numerous comments on my last post: Hinduization of ISKCON? What do you mean exactly?’ It seems to have prompted a discussion in which many wanted to explain exactly what they did mean when they used the word ‘Hinduization.’

I don’t normally publish every comment I receive but this time I thought I would, and I hope readers learned something from the discussion.

This particular discussion is vigorously ongoing within certain parts of our movement, and completely non-existent or irrelevant in many other parts. That’s what it means to be an international society I suppose: issues in one part of the world are not issues in another.

As I have mentioned before – at considerable length – our movement for Krishna consciousness has a wide variety of members from all different ages, nationalities, ethnic backgrounds and political persuasions. There are devotees of Krishna who are politically communist and who think that’s just a wonderful combination; there are others who consider capitalism the only way forward. We have left-wingers, ultra-conservatives, and all shades of political colour in between.

Our ISKCON members come in all shapes, sizes, and types of religious practice: from ‘ultra-liberal’ through to ‘ultra-orthodox’ and everything in between. There are those you might describe as contemplatives, the devotees who want to live a peaceful, quiet existence where they can chant and study free from any social responsibilities. Then we have our outgoing missionary-spirited devotees who are only happy in a bustling urban crowd. Then there’s our country community builders who see the importance of rural living and alternative economic sustainability.

Personally, I feel a movement such as ours requires all types of persons, and requires them to be all highly committed to their respective visions. Only that will produce the practical results we need for the next generation of devotees. Getting to the next generation is the challenge, of course. Other religious movements have been unable to handle the mix of such ideologically and politically diverse members. They split into various camps, unable to reconcile the differences between themselves.

Srila Prabhupada believed it was possible for all different types of people to live and work productively together if they had divine service to Krishna as their common purpose. No matter what their apparent differences might be, the common spirituality would bind them together.

But any type of society has to be organized in such a way as to harness the talents of the members, harmonize them into reaching agreed goals, and by doing so establish common good. We don’t do that by artificially homogenizing the diversity; we do that by preserving their individuality, then seeing how best to arrange that different types of people can contribute their skills and labor to each others lives.

Srila Prabhupada tells the story of two men who were walking along a road together. One man paused, bent down, and picked up a piece of string. They carried on walking for another half mile and again the man paused, bent down and picked up, this time, a stick. The other man was slightly puzzled by this behaviour but said nothing. A little further down the road, the man picked up a dried up old gourd to add to his collection. As the men walked, still talking, the man fastened the stick and the string to the gourd in such a way as to make an ektar, a little one-stringed musical instrument. This story was told to illustrate the principle that apparently unusable items can become much more valuable by their intelligent combination.

Similarly, diverse people can be intelligently joined together to create a vibrant society. Just as the string, gourd and stick remain individuals with their own nature, so different types of people – with different opinions – retain their natures but function well together in a particular combination.



Filed under Journal

3 responses to “Let’s value our differences – and still work together

  1. jaya vijaya das


    “Let’s value our differences – and still work together”…Perfectly said Prabhuji. Thanks for this and all your enlightening articles. It was great reading “Hinduization of ISKCON?” all the 73 (and still counting) comments. I hope we can learn something from everyone and express our love to Srila Prabhupada by our co-operation. Please take care. Jai Sri Radhe! Ys, Jaya Vijaya das

  2. dusyanta dasa

    Hare Krsna.
    I would like to thank Krpamoya Prabhu personally over the web in his openminded approach to “Hinduisation” posting.
    One thing that bothers me a lot is the exclusion of members of Iskcon from Iskcon. And this example that Krpamoya has set is a positive step in helping us heal our wounds.I think it is the right way to keep unification in diversity in Iskcon.
    The books by Scott Peck on how to define and maintain Community (Different Drum etc)are a helpful hand book to members of Iskcon in the steps of forgiveness,being sorry and forebearance.We all can develop these qualities in an attempt to understand our opposing points of view and agree to disagree without forming walls,hedges and barriers.
    After all is said and done we are all on the same side,Vaisnavas.We all do make mistakes and errors but we have to overlook them just like we would our sons and daughters whilst growing up making mistakes all the time and we forgive them.
    In Community, all diametrically opposing views can be accomadated but through dialogue that is open,understanding and inclusive.
    As we have had the Rittvik issue and the Guru issue burning through iskcon these 30 years or so we could have dealt with these subjects in a better way to learn from our mistakes,support each other, and find a common ground principle as a guide to get through this together.We are stronger together no matter what.And we can show our solidarity to Iskcon through out love ,respect and integrity of Srila Prabhupada who is our common object of worship.
    We have all had to get through huge piles of mud,horse manure etc,no-one said it was going to be easy,but we have to let go of our preconceptions ,our pain,our enviousness,our bodily conceptions.When we arrive in the light of the Brahman effulgence,situated in full knowledge we are able to recognise everything around us as related to Krsna,just like ourselves,how can we possibly have material differences in that state of existence.
    Om ajnana-timirandhasya……tasmai sri-gurave namah.
    This Sri Guroh,the one who forced our eyes open with the torchlight of knowledge,this Sri Guroh,He is the One who unites us.We come together through Sri Guroh.

    • Thanks Dusyanta prabhu. Perhaps we need to do more kirtan. When we all join together for kirtan our mouths are filled with the mahamantra and there is no opportunity for heated debate. Then afterwards comes the feasting – another opportunity for filling the mouth with something other than heated words. In this way, kirtan and prasadam will save us all.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s